On My Oath.

Most osteopathic medical students will take an oath adopted in 1954 by the American Osteopathic Association. We examine this oath to explore its ethical content by focusing on two specific lines. We conclude that the oath would benefit from scrupulous revision to promote patient-centered care.

Social media use and paediatric practice: Hippocratic help, hype or harm?

Social media is increasingly a part of our personal and professional life and is here to stay. Here, I reflect on issues surrounding the use of social media (SMU) in the digital health context by clinicians in Australian paediatric health care. I aim to briefly highlight some inherent multifactorial and contextual ethical considerations which mainly relate to professionalism; including boundaries, obligations to patients and families within the therapeutic alliance, and balancing the help, hype and harm of SMU in clinical practice. I conclude that digital health and SMU are ubiquitous, and can be beneficial if used circumspectly with Hippocratic principles that have been updated for the modern era and are grounded in ancient moral codes. Unfettered SMU however, without adherence to ethical and legal guidelines is problematic, and may expose patients, families and clinicians to significant risk of harm and moral vulnerability. Justifiable, explicit, consistent and regularly reviewed boundaries, both professional and personal, are ethically advisable. These should reflect, and adapt to, the rapidly evolving nature of social media as imprudent digital health and SMU without proportionate limits, may undermine still relevant Hippocratic tenets, and the primacy of doing no harm.

On the Heart of the Hippocratic Corpus: its meaning, context and purpose.

Though the Hippocratic text On the Heart has garnered significant attention in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries from classicists, physicians and historians of medicine alike, no commentary on this important work currently exists. There remain, however, central questions of interpretation concerning a number of important points: in particular, how the author understands the structure and functioning of the heart.The significance of this text for the history of cardiovascular medicine can be found first in its position as being radically advanced in its portrayal of the inner structure of the heart when compared with any other Hippocratic text. At the same time, the text falls dramatically short of the discoveries of the Alexandrian researchers who studied during the Hellenistic period-that is, around the same period as this text's likely composition. In addition, this work contains the first extant description of the valves of the heart, and its detailed descriptions of a cuspid valve and the chordae tendineae have led several scholars to imagine that this text even contains evidence of either a systematic dissection of an animal heart or-what seems impossible outside of Alexandria, Egypt at that time-evidence of the dissection of a human heart.This article intends to provide a full commentary on the text by consolidating, and in some cases correcting, previous interpretive attempts to understand an often referenced, and at times misinterpreted, ancient medical treatise.

Advocating for neurodata privacy and neurotechnology regulation.

The ability to record and alter brain activity by using implantable and nonimplantable neural devices, while poised to have significant scientific and clinical benefits, also raises complex ethical concerns. In this Perspective, we raise awareness of the ability of artificial intelligence algorithms and data-aggregation tools to decode and analyze data containing highly sensitive information, jeopardizing personal neuroprivacy. Voids in existing regulatory frameworks, in fact, allow unrestricted decoding and commerce of neurodata. We advocate for the implementation of proposed ethical and human rights guidelines, alongside technical options such as data encryption, differential privacy and federated learning to ensure the protection of neurodata privacy. We further encourage regulatory bodies to consider taking a position of responsibility by categorizing all brain-derived data as sensitive health data and apply existing medical regulations to all data gathered via pre-registered neural devices. Lastly, we propose that a technocratic oath may instill a deontology for neurotechnology practitioners akin to what the Hippocratic oath represents in medicine. A conscientious societal position that thoroughly rejects the misuse of neurodata would provide the moral compass for the future development of the neurotechnology field.

The ethical dilemmas of risky decisions.

Even in a pandemic there seem to be inherent conflicts of interest between the individual and societal consequences of remedial actions and strategies. Actions taken in the sole interests of patients, as required by the Hippocratic oath, can have broadly inconvenient economic implications for the State. ("Average" benefits for a population can impose individual inconveniences for the vulnerable.). Understandably these decisions are not normally made explicitly and transparently by governments. This leads to seemingly illogical and inhumane strategies which are not understood and hence mistrusted and often ignored by the public. Vaccination sentiments on social media are often an unwanted symptom of this dilemma. This article outlines and discusses a number of examples of such situations with a focus on ethical aspects. It concludes that each case must be considered individually as to the issues that need to be weighed in these difficult decisions; and that there are no clear and universally acceptable ethical solutions. What can be learned from the COVID-19 crisis is that short term utilitarianism has consequences that in the eyes of the population are unacceptable. This lesson seems equally valid for cost benefit evaluations regarding other risks, such as from hazardous industries, flood defenses, and air transport. Decisionmakers and politicians can learn that persuasion only goes so far. In the end the people appear to prioritize in terms of deontology.

Contributions of Hippocratic medicine and Plato to today's debate over health, social determinants and the authority of biomedicine.

By exploring a competition for authority on health and human nature between Plato and Hippocratic medicine, this paper offers a fresh perspective on an overarching debate today involving health and the role of healthcare in its safeguarding. Economically and politically, healthcare continues to dominate the USA's handling of health, construed biophysically as the absence of disease. Yet, notoriously, in major health outcomes, the USA fares worse than other countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Clearly, in giving pre-eminence to healthcare, the USA is doing far less than it could to protect and improve health. Meanwhile, mounting evidence supports the view that health impacts of social determinants besides healthcare (eg, education) surpass healthcare in heft. Circumscribed shifts in the USA's current frame will not suffice: what's needed is a change in its overall template for addressing health. Unless this is widely seen, the sway of biomedicine will likely be reduced slowly, if at all. That biomedicine's role in relation to health is raised increasingly as a question is a sign that its ongoing supremacy is not a forgone conclusion. But making the most of this opportunity requires appreciating that 'How should health's relationship to medicine be conceptualised?' is not the most fundamental query that we need to pose. Through consideration of Hippocratic medicine and Plato, I argue that the most availing answer to this particular question can come only after exploration of three larger questions involving health's status as a human good and its relationship to human flourishing. Exploration of the Greeks is, thus, valuable methodologically. What's more, it supports today's advocacy of 'health promotion', a perspective tying health closely to well-being that has yet to achieve the overall prominence that it warrants.

'Swear by Thy Gracious Self': North American Medical Oath-Taking in 2014/2015.

Over the past century, six studies - the most recent data from 2000 - and one review have comprehensively examined the content of medical oaths and oath-taking practices, all focusing on North America, providing an insight into the ethical beliefs of each era. Our study sought to establish a new point of reference. In 2014/2015, oaths from 150 of all 153 US and Canadian medical schools were collected and analyzed. All but one school administered medical oaths and most schools administered more than one. Since 2000, student-written oaths became more popular, and new themes, such as self-care and professionalism, were identified in the oaths for the first time. However, as was identified in 2000, the oaths' contents are disparate and even conflicting at times, raising questions as to whether medicine is being taught or practiced with a coherent ethical worldview.

Hippocratic Oath and current medical oaths.

The so-called Hippocratic Oath is based on a standardized form of oath in the ancient world and is undoubtedly the most famous, most discussed and most commented part of the Corpus Hippocraticum, collection of medical writings whose authorship is traditionally attributed to the legendary physician Hippocrates. The study will first introduce the nature of this brief text and the various theories about the origins of the Oath, as well as the evidence for its earliest use. The second part of the study focuses on the history of medical oaths in Czechoslovakia since 1918, especially on the changes in the text of the oaths after 1948 (mainly on the basis of so far unpublished documents from the archives), and presents the form of current medical oaths in the Czech Republic, with reference to the formulations of the Hippocratic Oath itself; an overview table lists both the Czech and Latin versions of the current medical oaths.

Practical Considerations and Recommendations for "a Revised Hippocratic Oath for the Era of Digital Health".

The Hippocratic Oath (the "Oath") is a longstanding body of ethical tenets that have undergone several amendments to accommodate changes and evolutions in the practice of medicine. In their recent perspective entitled, "A Revised Hippocratic Oath for the Era of Digital Health," Meskó and Spiegel offered proposed amendments to the Oath to address both challenges and needs that follow digital health implementation in clinical practice. In this commentary, we offer additional thoughts and considerations to Meskó and Spiegel's proposed amendments to accomplish two goals: (1) reflect on the shared goals and values of all digital health stakeholders and (2) drive home the focus on affirming patient choice, autonomy, and respect.

A Revised Hippocratic Oath for the Era of Digital Health.

Physicians have been taking the Hippocratic Oath for centuries. The Oath contains a set of ethical rules designed to guide physicians through their profession; it articulates a set of true north principles that govern the practice of medicine. The Hippocratic Oath has undergone several revisions, most notably in 1948 by the World Medical Association. However, in an era of rapid change in medicine, we believe it is time to update the Oath with modest but meaningful additions so that it optimally reflects 21st century health care. The rise of digital health has dramatically changed the practice of medicine in a way that could not have been easily predicted at the time Hippocrates outlined his ethical principles of medicine. Digital health is a broad term that encompasses use of digital devices and platforms, including electronic health records, patient-provider portals, mobile health apps, wearable biosensors, artificial intelligence, social media platforms, and medical extended reality, to improve the process and outcomes of health care delivery. These technologies have driven a cultural transformation in the delivery of care. We offer modest suggestions to help prompt discussion and contemplation about the current Oath and its relevancy to our changing times. Our suggestions are not meant to be a definitive set of final recommendations. Rather, we propose new text that bodies such as the World Medical Association might consider integrating into an updated Oath, just as previous changes were adopted to ensure the Oath remains relevant and impactful for all physicians and their patients.

Juramento de Hipócrates: análise crítica / Hippocratic Oath: a critical analysis / Juramento de Hipócrates: un análisis crítico

Resumo O Juramento de Hipócrates é, talvez, o mais importante texto de ética médica do mundo ocidental. Amplamente discutido desde a Idade Média por estudantes e filósofos, mesmo com o dito fim da medicina hipocrática em favor do método científico, o documento suscita questões éticas essenciais e é adotado, com variações, em diversas instituições de ensino pelo mundo. Esta revisão procura analisar os textos transmitidos no original, apresentar algumas das interpretações que recebeu ao longo da história e suas leituras e versões em diferentes línguas, além de oferecer uma tradução moderna e comentada do original em grego. Por fim, discute-se sua adoção em escolas de medicina na atualidade.

Abstract The Hippocratic Oath is, perhaps, the most important text of medical ethics in the Western world. Widely discussed since the Middle Ages by students and philosophers, even with the so-called end of Hippocratic medicine in favor of the scientific method, the document still raises essential ethical questions and is adopted, with variations, in various educational institutions worldwide. This review analyzes the original texts, presents some of the interpretations it received throughout history and its readings and versions in different languages, and offers a modern and commented translation of the original in Greek. Finally, its adoption in medical schools today is discussed.

Resumen El Juramento de Hipócrates quizás sea el texto de ética médica más importante en el mundo occidental. Desde la Edad Media se viene discutiendo este documento entre estudiantes y filósofos, incluso con el objetivo de la medicina hipocrática a favor del método científico, además de plantear aspectos éticos esenciales, es utilizado con sus variaciones por diversas instituciones educativas. Esta revisión busca analizar los textos en el original, presentar algunas de las interpretaciones que había recibido a lo largo de la historia, sus lecturas y versiones en diferentes idiomas, así como exponer una traducción moderna y comentada del original en griego. Por último, se discute la actual utilización de este documento en las facultades de medicina.

Soft Skills Are Hard Skills-A Historical Perspective.

The increasingly swift changes in the field of medicine require a reassessment of the skills necessary for the training of technically qualified doctors. Today's physicians also need to be capable of managing the complex issue of personal relationships with patients. Recent pedagogical debates have focused on so-called "soft skills", whose acquisition is presented in literature as a quite recent addition to medical studies. Moreover, the historical investigation of deontological texts dating from the mid-nineteenth century back to the Hippocratic Oath shows that medicine has always discussed the need to integrate technical expertise in medicine with specific personal and relationship-based skills. Debates have often circled around whether these "soft skills" could actually be taught or how they could be successfully transmitted to training physicians. The belief that defining medicine is more complex than defining other similar sciences and that the instruments to be used in the relationship with patients cannot be limited to those provided by technical aspects shows a new awareness. Today, this view is often stated as an innovative realization on the part of doctors with regard to the complexity of training and action in a delicate area in which they are entrusted with the management of the balance of the system that is the human body.

A Hippocratic Oath for Mathematicians? Mapping the Landscape of Ethics in Mathematics.

While the consequences of mathematically-based software, algorithms and strategies have become ever wider and better appreciated, ethical reflection on mathematics has remained primitive. We review the somewhat disconnected suggestions of commentators in recent decades with a view to piecing together a coherent approach to ethics in mathematics. Calls for a Hippocratic Oath for mathematicians are examined and it is concluded that while lessons can be learned from the medical profession, the relation of mathematicians to those affected by their work is significantly different. There is something to be learned also from the codes of conduct of cognate but professionalised quantitative disciplines such as engineering and accountancy, as well as from legal principles bearing on professional work. We conclude with recommendations that professional societies in mathematics should sponsor an (international) code of ethics, institutional mission statements for mathematicians and syllabuses of ethics courses for incorporation into mathematics degrees.

[Spirituality and care in the Muslim tradition]. / La spiritualité et les soins selon la tradition musulmane.

Spirituality in health care in the sense of the Muslim tradition requires inspiration from The Medicine of the Prophet, written by Jalâl ad-Din as-Suyûtî in the 15th century. A work in line with the principles of the Hippocratic oath. It consists in restoring, preserving or promoting health in all its elements, physical and mental, individual and social.

Honrar el juramento hipocrático / Honor the Hippocratic Oath

"No llevar otro propósito que el bien y la salud a los enfermos" fue la base del juramento que Hipócrates trasmitió a sus discípulos. Recordarlo nos hace necesariamente reflexionar sobre el rol de los médicos para mantener este principio ético que, a más de dos milenios de vigencia, continúa siendo el motor que impulsa nuestra práctica cotidiana. Asistimos a una era extraordinaria con el desarrollo exponencial de nuevos conocimientos. Se estima que la humanidad cada 2 años duplica la información y probablemente estos lapsos se reduzcan a solo 11 horas en las próximas décadas, de acuerdo a algunos pronósticos.

Violentar el pensamiento médico: la revolución de la bioética en la medicina / TO VIOLENT THE MEDICAL THINKING: THE REVOLUTION OF BIOETHICS IN MEDICINE

En el presente trabajo presentamos otra mirada del acontecer del hombre en el mundo de las Ciencias Biológicas, especialmente, en el mundo de la Medicina. Trazamosun paralelismo entre el pensamiento de Martín Heidegger con respecto a la diferencia ontológica entre el ser y ente y lo ocurrido dentro del mundo médico a partir del olvido del ser en el hombre padeciente. En este camino, nos proponemos realizar una reflexión antropológica desde el origen de la Medicina hasta nuestros días y exponer el devenir que sufrió la figura del ser y su enteque derivó en un privilegio a este último en detrimento del primero. Para ello, describimos un brevísimo bosquejo de la Medicina Hipocrática y de su visión del médico que se enfocaba a la atención tanto del ser como del ente del hombre. Luego analizamos el estudio de la etapa médica posterior en la cual aparece el olvido del ser del ente/hombre/enfermo. Desde allí surge un movimiento iniciado en los años 70 del siglo pasado, el movimiento bioético, que despierta un nuevo acontecer del hombre en el mundo de las Ciencias Biológicas respetando su autonomía

In the present work I take another look at the way man happens in the world of Biological Sciences, especially in the world of Medicine. I draw a parallel between the thought of Martín Heidegger regarding the ontological difference between being and being and what happened within the medical world from the forgetting of being in the suffering man. Along this path, I propose to carry out an anthropological reflection from the origin of Medicine to the present day and expose the evolution suffered by the figure of the being and the entity of it that resulted in a privilege to the latter to the detriment of the former. To do this, I describe a very brief sketch of Hippocratic Medicine and its vision of the doctor that focused on the attention of both the being and the being of man. Ten I analyze the study of the later medical stage, in which, the forgetfulness of the being of the entity / man / sick appears. From there arises a movement started in the 70s of the last century, called the bioethical movement, which awakens a new happening of man in the world of Biological Sciences while respecting his autonomy